Lasă-mă să încerc să înțeleg. That’s where we differ A LOT.
Așa, crezi că poziția liberală este: Drum rolă…
Government does have right to limit the number of child a rich father can make.
Apoi, mi-ai spus asta mai bine decât de sine mea:
Care au mai mulți copii decât “Rata de înlocuire” este ABUZ
Is that what you’re saying?
1. Guvernul nu are dreptul de a împiedica pe cei săraci pentru a păstra copii de reproducere. În India și Indonezia, de exemplu, copil de săraci sunt doar foame și de guvern ar trebui să lase doar să se întâmple asta. Dar e legal de a păstra copii de reproducere nu vă puteți permite să educe, îmbrăca, and feed.
2. Yet government does have a justifiable case to limit the number of child Este că ceea ce spuing>
Is that what you’re saying?
It doesn’t matter that each kids of a billionaire ended up being more successful than each kid of homeless bum in a welfare less state. It doesn’t matter that you can have it both way, quality and quantity, in businesses. It doesn’t even matter that the rich smart billionaires, maybe nobel laurates, already give better genes to those kids. It doesn’t matter that in modern state, kids learn mainly from video games rather than government infested schools or father’s “quality time” that’s made obsolete by iPad. It doesn’t matter if my kids can do programming before they age ten. It doesn’t matter that if mom doesn’t have to work kids will have access to more mom’s time. Billionaires just can’t make more than 2.1 kids.
So where can that billionaire inherit all his wealth if he only has 2 copii?
Damn and all this time I thought the mullahs are the greatest threat of freedom. At least they allow contract marriage and polygamy though I still hate them for criminalizing porn and sex outside their pimphood called marriage.
No wonder you got economy crisis. Maybe those creationists are right. We are getting dumber. No wonder we keep killing each other.
Yet it’s legal to mate with that homeless bum as long as he is single and it’s illegal for hot babes to agree to share a rich smart males. And who decide that? The woman? Nu. Tu. You believe what’s good for “teh children” and you effectively say that you and government can decide who the women should choose. Namely they much choose a man that doesn’t have 2.1 kids yet.
That’s what you think is ideal?
If that’s libertarianism, I am not a libertarian. În fapt,, I realized I am closer to minarchist. Ehei, I may be somewhere between minarchist and social democrat actually. Even that social democrat don’t limit freedom as much. I am surprised that this is what most white people think. That somehow it’s not okay to make many kids even if you can afford it. That’s how they’re dysgenic, like chinese. Bine, I guess I realized now that I have no allies.
Also who says that replacement rate is 2.1? If a man is so rich and attractive like Tiger Wood and have 10 mistresses, his replacement rate is 12.1 dreapta?
Parenting acum și apoi is a post from: Piața liberă nelimitat
Incoming termenii de căutare:
- powered by phpBB history of technology in schools (21)
- choose hottest babes (10)